ArticleMicrobial ecology2026
Microbial Communities Across Social Roles in Small Carpenter Bee Nests.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bee microbiota form important symbiotic relationships with their hosts, but microbial communities vary across bee species, sociality, and environment. Comparing the microbiome of bees with different social roles and foraging behaviours may uncover the ways in which microbiota are environmentally acquired and subsequently introduced and spread into the nest environment. Here, we performed metabarcoding of the 16S rRNA, ITS, and ribulose biphosphate carboxylase large (rbcL) regions on mothers, dwarf eldest daughters, and regular daughters in nests of the facultatively social, small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata, contrasting bacteria, fungi, and plant associates. We also performed two different sampling types by characterizing the microbiome using whole-guts and whole-bodies. Social role in nest impacted the microbial community composition and mothers were found to demonstrate increased plant diversity compared to their daughters, more specifically in whole-bodies, highlighting the ability to determine plants that bees are visiting during foraging through DNA metabarcoding. We also found that metabarcoding of the whole-body recovered increased fungal and plant diversity compared to whole-guts, suggesting that including microbiota from beyond the gut offers an opportunity to characterize uncommon associates that bees encounter, particularly through plant-pollinator relationships. As the transmission of beneficial symbionts and pathogens between individuals are studied for its impact on bee health, microbial analyses of bees across different environments and levels of sociality provides unique biomonitoring that can indicate the health of the larger bee community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.