SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2026
Women's Experiences of Screening and Assessment of Mental Health Problems in the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health problems occur frequently in the perinatal period and timely identification is key for appropriate support to be offered. Women are routinely asked about their mental health and may undergo formal screening as part of healthcare services in the perinatal period. The aim of this review was to explore women's views and experiences of being screened for mental health problems and to identify which aspects of this screening process they considered to be important. A systematic search was conducted across five electronic databases for potentially eligible studies published up to July 2025. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesise the findings extracted from the thirty-eight papers included in the final analysis. Reciprocal translation resulted in a line of argument synthesis incorporating three over-arching themes. These were 'Opportunities presented by screening' 'Difficulties with screening' and 'Context and constraints'. Identification of salient aspects of the screening process revealed that preferences for how screening is conducted were varied, but more important than the specific method/mode used was the value that women placed on the concept of screening. Nevertheless, several process related factors, such as women's knowledge and expectations of screening, the screening method and environment, were found to be influential. An important implication for clinical care is that perinatal mental health screening can offer impactful and positive opportunities for women when they see value in the process and when this is facilitated by well validated, person-centred, and flexible screening approaches. Questions regarding suicide/self-harm specifically, presented difficulties, and there is an urgent need to examine how this can be made more acceptable to women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.