Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101547›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2026

Women's Experiences of Screening and Assessment of Mental Health Problems in the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.

Kerry Hozhabrafkan, Patricia Gooding, Anja Wittkowski, Sanaa Hyder, Sarah Peters

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kerry HozhabrafkanDivision of Psychology and Mental, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. kerry.hozhabrafkan@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Patricia GoodingDivision of Psychology and Mental, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Anja WittkowskiDivision of Psychology and Mental, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Sanaa HyderDivision of Psychology and Mental, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Sarah PetersDivision of Psychology and Mental, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health problems occur frequently in the perinatal period and timely identification is key for appropriate support to be offered. Women are routinely asked about their mental health and may undergo formal screening as part of healthcare services in the perinatal period. The aim of this review was to explore women's views and experiences of being screened for mental health problems and to identify which aspects of this screening process they considered to be important. A systematic search was conducted across five electronic databases for potentially eligible studies published up to July 2025. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesise the findings extracted from the thirty-eight papers included in the final analysis. Reciprocal translation resulted in a line of argument synthesis incorporating three over-arching themes. These were 'Opportunities presented by screening' 'Difficulties with screening' and 'Context and constraints'. Identification of salient aspects of the screening process revealed that preferences for how screening is conducted were varied, but more important than the specific method/mode used was the value that women placed on the concept of screening. Nevertheless, several process related factors, such as women's knowledge and expectations of screening, the screening method and environment, were found to be influential. An important implication for clinical care is that perinatal mental health screening can offer impactful and positive opportunities for women when they see value in the process and when this is facilitated by well validated, person-centred, and flexible screening approaches. Questions regarding suicide/self-harm specifically, presented difficulties, and there is an urgent need to examine how this can be made more acceptable to women.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental DisordersPerinatal CarePregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansPregnancyMeta-ethnographyPerinatal mental healthQualitativeScreeningSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42101547
PMCPMC13562364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.