ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
A multidisciplinary paediatric endocrine genetic clinic: experience from a single tertiary centre.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multidisciplinary care is vital to the smooth running of patient-centred care, especially in the context of rare conditions. This service evaluation aimed to determine the potential benefits of a combined paediatric endocrine genetic clinic at a tertiary hospital, including increased diagnostic rates. Retrospective review of case notes of patients who attended the combined clinic at the Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, between 2022 and 2024 was done. Data collected included the type of genetic testing which had been performed, diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes. The data were evaluated qualitatively. A total of 21 patients (median age 5.3 years, range 6 months to 21 years) were included. Then, 43% were given a new genetic diagnosis, the greatest diagnostic yield occurring from whole-exome sequencing and MS-MLPA, with 67% of patients referred for further specialist input or investigations after attendance at the clinic.
conclusionThis study brings to light the benefits of a multidisciplinary endocrine-genetics clinic in the management of an under-researched patient cohort. It offers a streamlined diagnostic pathway with high diagnostic yield and improved patient experience. This clinic also highlighted the need for specialist input after genetic diagnoses were made to improve long-term health outcomes. However, limitations are its retrospective nature and absence of patient-reported outcomes; there is a need for future prospective research. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The results of genetic testing can be challenging to interpret without specialist input. • MDT clinics improve care coordination and diagnostic decision-making in complex multisystem conditions. WHAT IS NEW: • This study is the first UK-based study evaluating a combined paediatric endocrine-genetics clinic. • The clinic streamlined care by reducing the need for multiple appointments, directed genetic testing and tailoring management plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42101527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.