Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101518›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Variation in management of febrile infants younger than 90 days across London: a retrospective cohort study.

Stephanie Habermann, Rose Hartzenberg, Eva M Loucaides, George Lawson, Dominic Carr, Ian Maconochie, Ruud G Nijman, London REACH Network Collaborative

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie HabermannThe London Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child Health (REACH) Network, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-0627
Rose HartzenbergThe London Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child Health (REACH) Network, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1893-445X
Eva M LoucaidesThe London Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child Health (REACH) Network, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8717-1045
George LawsonThe London Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child Health (REACH) Network, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5968-0010
Dominic CarrThe London Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child Health (REACH) Network, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6015-0411
Ian MaconochieDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Division of Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital - Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-8550
Ruud G NijmanDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Division of Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital - Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK. ruud.nijman@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-8161
London REACH Network Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluate variation in care of febrile infants presenting to London hospitals and adherence to national Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Retrospective multicentre cohort study conducted at 21 London hospitals. Infants ≤ 90 days of age presenting with fever or caregiver reported fever between 1st April 2021-31st March 2022 were included. Outcome measures were variations in patient management and adherence to national CPGs. Of 2,008 presentations, 41.1% were febrile during assessment. 73.7% had blood tests (range across hospital sites: 55.4-96.7%), 40.8% had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing (17.1-70.7%), 63.4% had urinalysis (43.4-85.4%) and 62.2% were investigated for SARS-CoV2 (26.5-91.7%). Antibiotics were started in 57.7% (35.4-90.2%) and 63.5% (46.7-99.2%) were admitted. Infants aged < 28 days and infants febrile during assessment were more likely to undergo investigations and be admitted. Adherence varied significantly across sites: full adherence to CPGs was achieved in 21.9% (site range 8.8-35.4%), partial adherence in 24.4% (18.0-35.3%), non-adherence in 31.2% (10.6-47.4%), and over-adherence in 23.5% (8.0-44.7%). CPG adherence was higher in infants aged < 28 days.Conclusions: There was wide variation in care across London hospitals with limited adherence to guidelines. This highlights the need to focus on refining and updating decision models and CPGs, with more specific recommendations for managing infants who are afebrile during initial assessment. Clear guidance with a focus on reducing missed diagnosis may impact patient safety and economical expenditure.

Indexed as

FeverGuideline AdherencePractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLondonMalePractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsChild healthEmergency carePaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID42101518
PMCPMC13156226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.