Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101513›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Mechanical and thermo-mechanical behavior of h-BNNS-reinforced polyurethane nanocomposites: a molecular dynamics and experimental analysis.

Mithilesh K Dikshit, Neetu Chaudhary, Vimal Kumar Pathak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mithilesh K DikshitDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institute of Infrastructure, Technology, Research And Management (IITRAM), Ahmedabad, India.
Neetu ChaudharyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institute of Infrastructure, Technology, Research And Management (IITRAM), Ahmedabad, India.
Vimal Kumar PathakDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. vimalkumar.pathak@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe present research systematically investigates polyurethane (PU)/hexagonal boron nitride nanosheet (h-BNNS) nanocomposites with varying h-BNNS loadings using a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation-driven framework, complemented by experimental validation based on the solvent-casting technique. The work aims to elucidate the fundamental structure-property-performance relationships governing the mechanical and thermo-mechanical behavior of PU in the presence of h-BNNS reinforcement.

methodAtomistic models of PU were constructed in Materials Studio software, and nanocomposite systems containing 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 wt.% h-BNNS were developed. Structural equilibration was achieved through energy minimization followed by dynamic simulations using the Forcite module with the DREIDING force field. Elastic, shear, and bulk moduli were determined using the constant strain approach with six independent deformation modes. Temperature-dependent behavior was investigated in the range of 300-600 K with 25 K increments. The simulation results demonstrated a monotonic enhancement in elastic, shear, and bulk moduli with increasing h-BNNS content, with the 0.7 wt.% system exhibiting the highest stiffness and resistance to deformation in ambient conditions. Thermo-mechanical analysis revealed gradual modulus degradation with temperature for all compositions; however, h-BNNS-reinforced systems consistently maintained superior stiffness, indicating enhanced thermal stability and delayed softening. Experimental validation was conducted by fabricating PU/h-BNNS nanocomposites via a solvent-casting method using identical filler concentrations. Experimentally, the elastic modulus increased up to 0.5 wt.% reinforcement of h-BNNS due to improved dispersion and strong interfacial bonding, followed by a reduction at 0.7 wt.% attributed to nanosheet agglomeration and stress concentration effects. In contrast, MD simulations predicted a continuous modulus increase with filler loading and yielded higher absolute values due to idealized assumptions such as defect-free interfaces and uniform dispersion. Despite quantitative discrepancies, both experimental and computational results exhibited strong qualitative agreement, identifying 0.5 wt.% h-BNNS as the optimal reinforcement level.

Indexed as

H-BNNSMechanical propertiesMolecular DynamicsNanocompositesThermo-mechanical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.