ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
A Dual-Task Deep-Learning Model with Fused Ultrasound Images for Simultaneous Typing and Grading of Cystocele.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe developed a dual-task deep-learning model, termed FD-Net, which utilizes fused two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound images to simultaneously automate cystocele typing and grading, and evaluated its diagnostic performance.
methodsWe retrospectively included 625 patients (467 cystocele, 158 normal). The model fused preprocessed two-dimensional (2D, resting and Valsalva) and three-dimensional (3D, levator hiatus) images as input. On the basis of a ResNet50 backbone, FD-Net performed both typing (normal, type I/II/III) and grading (normal, mild, significant) tasks. Its performance was compared against single-modal models using only 2D images (ST-Net for typing, SG-Net for grading). Evaluation metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with model comparisons made using McNemar tests.
resultsOn the test set (n = 188), compared with single-modal models using only 2D images, FD-Net achieved higher accuracy in typing (79.68% vs. ST-Net's 70.05%, P = 0.023) and grading (81.38% vs. SG-Net's 71.28%, P = 0.006). The F1-score improved notably for normal cases (from 64.94% to 85.44%) and mild cystocele (from 57.94% to 69.47%). For other key categories, FD-Net also attained high F1-scores of 87.50% for significant prolapse and 77.08% for type III. All AUC values exceeded 0.92.
conclusionsThe dual-task model with image fusion accomplishes simultaneous cystocele typing and grading, showing higher diagnostic performance than single-modal models, and holds potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42101493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.