ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Evaluation of Nurses' Practice Environment in Cardiovascular Hospitals: Nurses' Perceptions.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Nurses' Practice Environment in Cardiovascular Hospitals: Nurses' Perceptions.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn attractive practice environment for nurses is essential in cardiac hospitals; however, limited studies are known about practice environment in this setting. This study aimed to evaluate nurses' perceptions of the practice environment in XXX cardiac hospitals. Additionally, this study seeks to identify nurse-related factors that influence nurses' nursing practices in these hospitals.
methodsA cross-sectional study utilizing a self-report questionnaire was conducted among a convenience sample of 115 nurses working in cardiac hospitals. Nurses' perceptions of the practice environment in cardiac hospitals were explored via the Nursing Work Index. A descriptive analysis was performed in the form of categorical variables presented as frequencies and percentages, and the continuous variables were presented as the means and standard deviations. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyze the relationship between sociodemographic factors and the level of environmental practice. The level of significance was set at a p value = (p ≤ 0.05).
resultsThe findings indicate an overall favorable practice environment, with 56% of the nurses reporting a good level of practice in the cardiac setting. Cardiac nurses held a positive perception of their nursing practice in cardiac care settings. Overall, the participants responded well, with a total mean score of (M ± SD = 3.38 ± 0.02) for their perceptions of leadership, staff support, nursing supervisory skills, participation in hospital committees, staffing and resource adequacy and collegial nurse‒physician relations. Nursing qualifications, years of experience and participation in nursing work management-related training courses were predictors of cardiac nurses' perceptions of the practice environment (p value = p ≤ 0.014).
conclusionSurvey nurses' perceptions of the practice environment in cardiac hospitals provide insight into nurses' actual readiness for providing high-quality care and hence positive patient health outcomes. Cardiac nurses should be involved in decision-making authority and advocate for the workplace to better support their independence, all to improve the nursing practice environment in cardiovascular hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.