ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Impact of Vietnam-era G.I. Bill eligibility on the distribution of later-life memory score levels and decline: evidence from the Vietnam draft lottery natural experiment.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We estimated the distributional impact of Vietnam-era G.I. Bill eligibility, a federal policy that subsidized education, impacting approximately 6 million veterans, on later-life memory levels and rate of age-related decline. We used Health and Retirement Study data (1998-2018) for men born 1947-1953 with at least one outcome assessment (n = 2337;15 433 person-waves). We proxied Bill eligibility using draft eligibility based on birthdate and self-reported veteran status. We used an algorithmic measure of memory as the outcome. We fit intention-to-treat and instrumental variables models at the mean and different outcome quantiles. We assessed effect modification using a childhood socioeconomic status index and self-reported race and ethnicity. Although imprecise, results are consistent with eligibility increasing memory levels but accelerating age-related decline, especially at lower quantiles. The magnitude of estimated effects were especially pronounced for men from low childhood socioeconomic backgrounds and Black men. For White men, eligibility was associated with uniformly accelerated decline across the distribution. Overall, our results paint a complex picture: eligibility may have improved overall memory score levels but also may have slightly increased the rate of age-related decline, especially among those with worse memory function. Further research is necessary to investigate the mechanisms by which such policies impact later-life memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.