Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100903›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2026

Comparison of an integrated versus stand-alone approach to post-validation surveillance for lymphatic filariasis in Niue: a micro-costing study, 2025.

Adam T Craig, Harriet Ls Lawford, Grizelda Mokoia, Patricia Tatui, Misiona Nicolas, Amanda Murphy, Tonia Marquardt, Son Hong Nghiem, Anderson E Stanciole, Colleen L Lau

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adam T CraigFrazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Harriet Ls LawfordFrazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Grizelda MokoiaDepartment of Health, Government of Niue, Alofi, Niue.
Patricia TatuiDepartment of Health, Government of Niue, Alofi, Niue.
Misiona NicolasDepartment of Health, Government of Niue, Alofi, Niue.
Amanda MurphyAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Tonia MarquardtNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Son Hong NghiemCentre for Health Service Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Anderson E StancioleGlobal Institute for Disease Elimination, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Colleen L LauFrazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a mosquito-borne parasitic disease which, in cases of chronic infection, may result in lymphoedema, elephantiasis, and hydrocele, imposing significant physical, social, and economic burdens. Global initiatives have reduced the prevalence of this condition, with Niue, a self-governing Pacific Island country, being validated as having eliminated LF as a public-health problem in 2016. To ensure transmission does not re-emerge, the World Health Organization recommends post-validation surveillance. As an integrated approach where LF-PVS is embedded within existing health programmes may reduce financial and labour costs and hence improve feasibility for resource constrained settings, we compare the costs of integrated LF-PVS in Niue with the counterfactual of stand-alone LF-PVS. Methods: We itemised activities and resources and assigned unit costs using a bottom-up micro-costing approach, drawing data from project budgets, accounting records, and staff reports. For the stand-alone scenario, we base LF survey inputs and activities on a recently implemented LF-PVS in a comparable context. For the integrated scenario, we embedded LF-PVS activities within a national STEPwise survey for non-communicable disease risk factors, with two research staff and one Department of Health officer responsible for implementation. All costs are reported in USD 2025 prices. Results: Total provider costs under the integrated scenario were USD 59 488 compared with USD 105 414 for the stand-alone. The integrated cost per participant tested was USD 59 compared to USD 105 for the stand-alone approach, representing a 44% reduction. The required Department of Health staff time was half in the integrated scenario, resulting in savings of approximately four weeks full-time equivalent staff time. Conclusions: This analysis provides evidence that programmatic integration of LF-PVS reduces cost to donors and lessens burden on public health staff. Future LF-PVS in the Pacific and elsewhere should consider integrating with routine health surveys to maximise operational efficiency.

Indexed as

Elephantiasis, FilarialPopulation SurveillanceCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansPacific Islands

Identifiers

PMID42100903
PMCPMC13154341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.