Trial reportCirculation2026
Determining the Physiological Threshold for Angina (ORBITA-FIRE): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Trial report in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn stable coronary artery disease, the primary goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is symptom relief. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios such as resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) are used to guide revascularization. Although these indices correlate with myocardial ischemia, they have never been validated against the onset of angina. The physiological thresholds for angina, FFR
methodsORBITA-FIRE (Finding the Invasive Threshold for Symptom Relief in Exertional Angina) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with stable angina and single-vessel coronary artery disease. After imaging-guided PCI, an in-stent balloon was incrementally inflated until angina occurred at rest. This angina threshold was verified against placebo inflation, and corresponding FFR
resultsSixty-five patients were enrolled (mean age, 63.9±8.7 years; 74% male; 69% hypertensive; 23% diabetic; 91% with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II-III angina). Median pre-PCI FFR was 0.59 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.46-0.70) and RFR was 0.61 (IQR, 0.40-0.82). Median FFR
conclusionsPhysiological thresholds for angina, FFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.