ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Developing SHAP interpretable machine learning models for assessing biopsychosocial risk in female drug users: a small sample study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While interventions for female drug users have received considerable attention, comprehensive and objective risk assessment tools-particularly those integrating biopsychosocial dimensions-remain lacking, despite their critical public health need. Objective: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive assessment model for evaluating the physiological, psychological, and social risks among female drug users. Methods: Based on the biopsychosocial model, variables of the five dimensions of physiological function, psychological and cognitive function, drug dependence, social support, and self-control were collected from 96 participants. Professionals rated these participants on the five dimensions and the total risk. These ratings and variables served as inputs and outputs for our classification model. We oversampled the data and evaluated the classification of 6 classifiers. Results: Firstly, the machine learning classification results for the 5-dimensional risk and total risk performed relatively well. Next, oversampling improved the classification performance for most dimensions (except social support risk) and the total risk assessment. After oversampling, the true strengths of different algorithms became more apparent, with Random Forest and Logistic regression emerging as the optimal classifier for multiple dimensions. Thirdly, by applying SHAP, a novel interpretability method, we identified key variables in each dimension and for the total risk, thereby enhancing the transparency of the model's decisions. Conclusion: The machine learning model, encompassing physiological, psychological, cognitive, drug refusal, social support, and self-control dimensions, modestly but effectively identified at-risk populations of female drug users. It should be noted that the current study is limited by the sample size of 96 participants; to address this, we plan to expand the sample in future research to overcome this constraint and reduce potential model overfitting. The developed model holds promise for researchers seeking to pinpoint at-risk female drug abusers, facilitating targeted interventions and corrections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.