ReviewHealth science reports2026
Vitamin D Status and Supplementation and the Functional Outcomes of Human Musculoskeletal Tissues: A Stratified Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: This systematic review examined associations between vitamin D status and/or supplementation and functional outcomes (e.g., strength, performance, falls), with secondary reporting of biomechanical endpoints of human muscle, tendon, and bone. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed human studies published from 1997 to 2024 that evaluated vitamin D supplementation/intake or serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) status in relation to functional outcomes and reported at least one biomechanical endpoint (e.g., strength-related properties, stiffness/tensile characteristics, bone mineral density [BMD], tendon outcomes). Eligible studies were English or Persian, conducted in humans, and included a vitamin D exposure and functional outcomes with biomechanical reporting. We excluded non-human and in vitro studies, conference abstracts without peer-reviewed full text, reviews, and studies lacking either vitamin D exposure or relevant functional/biomechanical outcomes. Results: Across eligible studies, higher vitamin D status and/or supplementation was generally associated with better muscle-related functional outcomes in older or clinical populations, particularly when baseline deficiency was present. Findings in athletic populations were mixed, with many studies showing null or inconsistent effects on strength and performance. Evidence suggested potential benefits for tendon repair in select contexts, and fracture risk reduction in specific populations; however, effects varied by baseline vitamin D status, participant characteristics, and outcome definitions. Large contemporary trials in broadly vitamin D-replete adults commonly reported no benefit for BMD or fracture outcomes. Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation appears most beneficial in older/clinical groups with deficiency, with improvements observed in selected functional outcomes (notably balance/falls). In broadly replete adults, evidence does not support meaningful benefits for BMD or fractures, and in elite athletes, performance effects are inconsistent and often null. Overall, findings support correction of deficiency rather than universal supplementation for performance enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.