Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100622›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

How Large, Decayed, and Moist Must Rotting Logs Be to Act as Thermally Buffered Microhabitats in Temperate Eastern United States Forests?

Ryan T Phillips, Ryan C Garrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan T PhillipsDepartment of Biology University of Mississippi Oxford Mississippi USA.
Ryan C GarrickDepartment of Biology University of Mississippi Oxford Mississippi USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-7061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deadwood is an essential habitat for forest biodiversity, yet coarse woody debris (CWD) is declining owing to silvicultural practices that impede recruitment (e.g., clearcutting, short logging rotations), and/or forest sanitization that prevents retention (e.g., removal of "waste wood"). Furthermore, connections among studies examining the ecological roles of CWD as potential refugia for saproxylic organisms susceptible to heat and desiccation, or cold, have been hampered by inconsistent thresholds used to define "large-diameter" logs. Here we measured temperature inside and outside rotting logs over four seasons in temperate montane Southern Appalachian forests, and assessed relationships between several metrics of thermal buffering with log diameter, decay stage, and moisture content. Our analyses showed that the microclimates of larger diameter logs exhibit significantly decreased temperature ranges in spring and fall, and increased minimum temperatures in winter and on extreme cold days. Qualitatively, logs with diameters of at least 25-30 cm provided modest to considerable thermal buffering (depending on the metric), and this may represent a useful threshold for targeted enhancement of CWD habitats. However, there was no detectable reduction of maximum temperatures in summer or on extreme warm days, suggesting that, in natural temperate mixed pine-oak forests in the eastern United States, a key benefit that saproxylic organisms gain from living in rotting logs may be avoidance of cold stress. Neither decay stage nor moisture content were significant predictors of thermal buffering in any season. Ultimately, larger diameter logs provide important microhabitats, and management strategies that prioritize their creation and retention should have far-reaching benefits for biodiversity in forests.

Indexed as

coarse woody debrisdeadwoodforest managementmicroclimatesaproxylicsouthern Appalachian Mountains

Identifiers

PMID42100622
PMCPMC13148867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.