ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Cost savings of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy using a digital infusion pump.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) enables IV antibiotic administration outside hospital settings and has been found to reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction. In Norway, OPAT has been less established due to the preference for narrow-spectrum antibiotics often requiring multiple daily doses. We undertook a cost evaluation of an OPAT programme using a continuous ambulatory delivery device (CADD), and comparison with costs of inpatient treatment for equivalent IV antibiotic courses. Materials and methods: A retrospective cost analysis was conducted on 170 consecutive patients treated with OPAT at Sørlandet Hospital, Norway (2016-2021). Eligible patients received multidose IV antibiotics at home using CADD pumps. OPAT costs included equipment and antibiotics, staff time, transportation and patient time, and were compared with estimated inpatient costs for the same treatment and duration. Sensitivity analyses tested robustness of the findings across various cost scenarios. Results: A total of 170 patients received OPAT, mostly with narrow-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics, with a mean duration of 16.4 days per patient (range 1-67 days), and an estimated saving of approximately 51 hospital bed days per month. The mean cost per OPAT treatment was €1603 versus €12 982 for inpatient care, i.e. representing 12% of inpatient costs. Sensitivity analysis confirmed OPAT savings between 72% and 89% across scenarios. Conclusions: These findings confirm that a CADD-based OPAT programme considerably reduces costs on a societal perspective in a publicly funded health system and contributes to reduced hospital bed occupancy. The ability to administer narrow-spectrum antibiotics supports antimicrobial stewardship.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.