Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100600›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026

Cost savings of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy using a digital infusion pump.

Rita Helleren, Marianne Jacobsen, Theis Theisen, Carl Erik Moe, Anne Opsal, Rune Trønnes, Vegard Skogen, Frode Gallefoss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rita HellerenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Marianne JacobsenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Theis TheisenDepartment of Economics and Finance, School of Business and Law, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Carl Erik MoeDepartment of Information Systems, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Anne OpsalDepartment of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Rune TrønnesDepartment of Patient Administration, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Vegard SkogenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Frode GallefossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) enables IV antibiotic administration outside hospital settings and has been found to reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction. In Norway, OPAT has been less established due to the preference for narrow-spectrum antibiotics often requiring multiple daily doses. We undertook a cost evaluation of an OPAT programme using a continuous ambulatory delivery device (CADD), and comparison with costs of inpatient treatment for equivalent IV antibiotic courses. Materials and methods: A retrospective cost analysis was conducted on 170 consecutive patients treated with OPAT at Sørlandet Hospital, Norway (2016-2021). Eligible patients received multidose IV antibiotics at home using CADD pumps. OPAT costs included equipment and antibiotics, staff time, transportation and patient time, and were compared with estimated inpatient costs for the same treatment and duration. Sensitivity analyses tested robustness of the findings across various cost scenarios. Results: A total of 170 patients received OPAT, mostly with narrow-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics, with a mean duration of 16.4 days per patient (range 1-67 days), and an estimated saving of approximately 51 hospital bed days per month. The mean cost per OPAT treatment was €1603 versus €12 982 for inpatient care, i.e. representing 12% of inpatient costs. Sensitivity analysis confirmed OPAT savings between 72% and 89% across scenarios. Conclusions: These findings confirm that a CADD-based OPAT programme considerably reduces costs on a societal perspective in a publicly funded health system and contributes to reduced hospital bed occupancy. The ability to administer narrow-spectrum antibiotics supports antimicrobial stewardship.

Identifiers

PMID42100600
PMCPMC13148532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.