ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Sensory acuity and cross-language phonetic similarity jointly predict second language vowel production accuracy.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research on second language (L2) speech perception and production has yielded mixed findings, suggesting that factors beyond perceptual ability influence L2 production outcomes. This study investigated predictors of inter-speaker variability in L2 vowel production, focusing on individual differences in auditory and somatosensory acuity. The roles of phonological awareness and trial-to-trial production variability were also examined. Methods: Forty English-speaking adult late learners of Mandarin produced two Mandarin vowels: /u/ (phonetically similar to English /u/) and /y/ (a novel vowel for English speakers). Production accuracy and trial-to-trial variability were measured acoustically. Auditory acuity was assessed using speech identification and discrimination tasks. Somatosensory acuity was measured through a Phonetic Awareness Task (PAT) and a novel Tongue Placement Task (TPT). Linear mixed-effects models were used to identify predictors of production accuracy. Results: Predictors of production accuracy differed by vowel. For the perceptually similar vowel /u/, lower production variability was the only significant predictor of higher accuracy. For the novel vowel /y/, higher somatosensory acuity (PAT) was the only significant predictor of accuracy. No predictors significantly accounted for production variability in either vowel. Discussion: These findings suggest that sensory acuity and L1-L2 phonetic similarity jointly constrain L2 speech learning. Specifically, somatosensory acuity supports the establishment of accurate articulatory targets for novel L2 sounds, while production variability reflects the stability of learners' phonetic category formation for perceptually similar L2 sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.