ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Threshold optimization in separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics using principal component analysis.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation direction and word familiarity in word translation: an fNIRS study of intermediate Japanese learners of English.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- EBA-related body-preferring responses in the occipitotemporal cortex measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: When trying to differentiate between hemodynamic cortical and extracerebral signals identified by devices used to detect cortical activity, statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) are commonly employed as alternative approaches to using short separation measurements to reduce the influence of extracerebral hemodynamics. PCA requires a threshold value to separate cortical and extracerebral signals; however, existing methods often rely on fixed thresholds that fail to account for inter-individual variability and differences in experimental design, potentially leading to over- or under-correction. Rather than introducing a novel extracerebral hemodynamics removal method, the present study aims to optimize the use of existing methodologies. Specifically, we proposed a method to optimize the threshold that differentiates cortical from extracerebral hemodynamics in PCA-based analyses. Methods: Each of the four analyses were applied to a dataset obtained from older participants performing a verbal n-back task: (1) no correction (NC), (2) short separation regression (SSR), (3) PCA with our proposed threshold optimization (PCA Results: NC displayed the strongest cortical activation, PCA Discussion: Optimizing the threshold for separating cortical and extracerebral hemodynamics is a practical and effective strategy when using PCA as an alternative to short-separation measurements. This approach enables appropriate correction even in the absence of short-separation channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.