SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Women's experiences of maternity care in high-income countries during the pandemic health system shock: a follow-up systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 disrupted healthcare systems globally, particularly challenging maternity services which continued to be operated as an essential service. Reconfigurations were implemented to continue providing care in a safe manner and in line with infection control restrictions. This systematic review of women's experiences of maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in high-income countries (HICs), aimed to synthesize published literature and inform future responses to global disasters. Material and methods: Electronic database of Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL PsychINFO, and the Cochrane COVID Study Register, were searched from June 2021- June 2024 to identify eligible records. Thematic synthesis was used to synthesise the data. Results: 79 studies were included with data from over 20,000 perinatal women, most were of moderate to high methodological quality. Data synthesis showed 11 themes across five main concepts related to maternity service reconfigurations, namely: (1) Care-seeking and care experience, (2) Virtual care, (3) Self-monitoring, (4) Vaccination, and (5) Ethical future of maternity care. Conclusions: Women predominantly viewed changes to maternity care negatively. Future strategies to ensure safeguarding of mothers and infants during crises should include enhancing service accessibility, emphasizing women-centered care, and prioritizing support systems for mothers and infants. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022355948, identifier: CRD42022355948.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.