ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Wastewater-based surveillance of microbial pathogens in GCC countries (2015-2025): a scoping review and questionnaire survey with stakeholders.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Source-Resolved Wastewater Metagenomics Reveals Distinct Resistome and Virulome Landscapes Across an Urban Wastewater Continuum.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) of microbial pathogens has become an increasingly useful approach to monitor public health at the population level. However, these efforts varied widely in scope, methodology and focus within the GCC region. It remains unclear how WBS is being used across the region, and to what extent it can inform decision-making or contribute to long-term surveillance infrastructure within the GCC. This review aimed to critically assess WBS studies conducted across GCC and to provide perspective on how to further strengthen the ability of WBS to inform and provide early detection on the emergence of health concerns arising from microbial contaminants that are circulating in the community. Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidance, aiming to identify and critically evaluate peer-reviewed studies that applied WBS across GCC between January 2015 and October 2025. A structured English-language literature search was carried out on the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Search results were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A survey was conducted with GCC stakeholders involved in the execution of wastewater surveillance, and their responses were studied to align actual WBS activities against that reported in the literature. Results: A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, with uneven distribution of studies published across the GCC countries ( Conclusion: Although WBS holds significant promises to enhance public health surveillance in the GCC, its potential remains underutilized. Moving forward, addressing capacity training and providing sustainable long-term funding mechanisms, standardizing methodological differences and/or providing a guideline that detail the best practices, promoting a consortium-based surveillance system and initiating research that can facilitate the utilization of WBS data to inform decision-making processes would be crucial for the successful integration of WBS into the region's public health framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.