Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Game theory and environmental health behavior: a population model of sunscreen use, social norms, and melanoma incidence.

Miryam Kerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Miryam KernerThe Ruth and Bruce Rapoport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Melanoma is a largely preventable yet economically significant cancer, particularly in high-UV regions. Despite strong evidence that sunscreen reduces melanoma risk, its use remains suboptimal due to misaligned private and social incentives. Methods: We develop an evolutionary game-theoretic model in which individuals choose between sunscreen use and non-use. Payoffs incorporate private benefits, costs, and externalities from shared healthcare financing. The model is calibrated using Australian data. Results: Behavior is driven by private incentives. When private benefits are lower than costs, populations converge to non-adoption, even when sunscreen use is socially optimal. Calibration shows this divergence arises in high-risk populations. Discussion: Sunscreen use represents a public goods problem with under-adoption driven by externalities. Policies such as subsidies, mandates, and social norm interventions are required to align incentives and improve public health outcomes.

Indexed as

Game TheoryHealth BehaviorMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsSocial NormsSunscreening AgentsAustraliaHumansIncidenceSunscreening Agentscost-effectivenesseconomic burdenhealth economicsmelanoma preventionpublic health policysunscreen subsidies

Identifiers

PMID42100522
PMCPMC13144000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.