ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Interpretable machine learning for early detection of carbapenem-resistant
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carbapenem-resistant Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 401 ICU patients with culture-confirmed Results: CRKP isolates accounted for 15.7% (63/401) of cases. LASSO regression identified nine predictors: procalcitonin (PCT), specimen type, prior MDR infection, prior carbapenem exposure, history of stroke, APACHE II score, white blood cell count, age, and hemoglobin. In the independent validation set, the XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.852 (95% CI: 0.745-0.959), with a sensitivity of 0.737, specificity of 0.891, accuracy of 0.867, and an F1-score of 0.636. The model demonstrated good calibration (Brier score: 0.088) and provided a net clinical benefit across a wide range of risk thresholds. SHAP analysis highlighted PCT, specimen source (blood), and prior resistance-related exposures as the most influential predictors. Conclusion: The integration of LASSO feature selection with the XGBoost algorithm, utilizing only routine clinical data, generates a reliable early-warning model for CRKP infection risk prior to the availability of susceptibility reports. This tool shows promising discriminative ability and calibration, offering potential to guide empirical therapy and support antimicrobial stewardship. Future multicenter prospective studies are warranted to validate its generalizability and real-world clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.