ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparing Virtual Reality and Robotic Training Effects on Balance Ability and Confidence in Older Adults.
Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls are the leading cause of injury and mortality among older adults-one in four individuals 65 years old and above experiences falls. Thus, balance training interventions that improve balance ability and reduce the risk of falls are of critical importance. Through two complementary interventions, our research sought to determine the effects of Virtual Reality (VR) compared to Robotic-Assisted Balance Training (RABT) on balance ability and balance confidence in older adults. The VR intervention utilized Oculus headsets to create immersive balance exercises, while the RABT employed a multidirectional overground robotic system (NaviGAITor). Participants (aged 60-85 years old) underwent a 6-week training protocol consisting of two 30 min sessions per week. Balance ability was quantified using center of pressure (COP) parameters and the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), while balance confidence was measured using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. Results indicated no statistically significant differences between the training methods. However, the RABT group showed trends toward enhanced balance performance, with observed decreases in mediolateral (ML) maximum displacement during wide stance conditions and reductions in BESS errors on both firm and foam surfaces. The VR group demonstrated significant changes in ML RMS values during tandem stance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.