ArticleBiomedical sciences instrumentation2025
UTILITY OF CHEST ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN QUANTIFYING CLOT AND PLEURAL EFFUSION VOLUME IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF PLEURAL DISEASE.
Article in Biomedical sciences instrumentation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection and monitoring of pleural disease is critical in guiding appropriate treatment decisions. In the United States, chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) are the most employed imaging techniques to assess pleural disease for diagnosis and management. However, repeated imaging using these modalities exposes patients to cumulative ionizing radiation. In contrast, chest ultrasonography offers a safer, cost-effective, and portable alternative that could be of advantage to pediatric, rural, or resource-limited hospital settings. In addition, ultrasonography brings great utility to preclinical research where advanced imaging is limited. In this study, we developed and validated an ultrasound-based tool that enabled pleural effusion and clot volume quantification in our preclinical models of disease (early-stage empyema, advanced-stage empyema, and retained hemothorax). Four methods were tested for estimating pleural effusion and of the two of these most accurate methods were used to quantify clot volume. Across three animal models of pleural disease, both the Predicted Pleural Effusion and Clot Volume (mL) were closest to the actual volume (gold standard, mL) when area volumetry (pleural effusion or clot) was conducted in the coronal view of the pleural space of the subjects. Lastly, ultrasonographic imaging was able to distinguish the difference in clot dissolution (Predicted Clot Volume, mL) between subjects treated with vehicle control or fibrinolytic therapy, providing evidence of its utility in our preclinical model. These findings support the potential applications of these volumetric tools for preclinical and potential clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42100468PMC13148432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.