Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100436›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Perineural invasion in solid tumors: biological foundations and the emerging integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Hisham F Bahmad, Yasamin Mirzabeigi, Youssef K Elajami, Wassim Abou-Kheir, Navya Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hisham F BahmadDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Yasamin MirzabeigiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Youssef K ElajamiMiami Dade College, Miami, FL, United States.
Wassim Abou-KheirDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Navya NairDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perineural invasion (PNI) represents a distinct route of cancer spread in many solid tumors. Its presence correlates with aggressive tumor behavior, local recurrence, neuropathic symptoms, and reduced survival across selected tumor types, including pancreatic, prostate, head and neck, colorectal, and gynecologic malignancies, among others. Despite its prognostic value, PNI remains inconsistently detected and reported, and incompletely integrated into the College of American Pathologists (CAP) cancer protocols and clinical decision-making. Over the last decade, advances in tumor-nerve biology have reframed PNI as an active, bidirectional phenomenon driven by molecular crosstalk between cancer cells, Schwann cells, neurons, and the surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME). Parallel advances in digital pathology, machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI) have opened new opportunities to standardize PNI detection and quantify its extent. This review provides a synopsis of current knowledge on the biological mechanisms and clinical relevance of PNI in solid tumors, with the emerging integration and application of ML- and AI-assisted approaches in histopathology and molecular profiling to advance detection and potential therapeutic targeting of PNI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital pathologymachine learningperineural invasionreviewsolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID42100436
PMCPMC13143894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.