ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Front-line treatment approaches in multiple myeloma: real-world data from a community-based oncology network.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The front-line (1L) treatment landscape for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is rapidly evolving with guidelines endorsing triplet and quadruplet regimens as new standard-of-care. Despite this, real-world evidence on current treatment patterns for NDMM remain limited, especially in community settings, where most care is delivered. This study describes 1L treatment patterns for NDMM using recent data from a large US community oncology network. Methods: This retrospective, observational study analyzed structured and unstructured medical records of patients treated at Texas Oncology. Patients with NDMM (aged ≥18 years) who initiated 1L between January 2015 and December 2022 were included. Patient characteristics, 1L treatment patterns, and temporal trends were described. Results: 3592 patients with NDMM who initiated 1L treatment were included. From 2015 to 2022, there was a nominal increase in the use of triplet regimens (59.9% to 87.6%). Quadruplet regimen use emerged in 2020 and rose from <1% to 9.4% in 2022. Daratumumab-based regimens numerically increased from 2% in 2019 to 29% in 2022. Daratumumab was integral to all quadruplet therapy regimens used by Texas Oncology centers and was predominantly utilized in the DVRd regimen. Conclusion: In this analysis, adoption of novel 1L regimens for NDMM, particularly daratumumab-based triplet and quadruplet regimens, was observed in recent years. However, the use of quadruplet regimens was still low in 2022, highlighting an opportunity for increased quadruplet uptake in the real-world. Future analysis will be essential to quantify the evolving uptake of quadruplet regimens in 1L and their impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.