ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Impact of educational intervention on the uptake of self-sampling for HPV test-based cervical cancer screening.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-sampling for HPV testing is increasingly adopted for cervical cancer screening globally, including in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, concerns remain regarding women's willingness and ability to collect samples and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Although prior studies in Africa and Nigeria have examined acceptability and barriers, there is limited evidence on whether structured educational interventions can modify women's attitudes toward HPV self-sampling in routine screening contexts. We evaluated the effect of a structured educational intervention on women's attitudes toward self-sampling and, secondarily, explored baseline correlates of willingness to self-sample among Nigerian women. Methods: We conducted a single-group pre-post quasi-experimental study nested within the African Collaborative Center for Microbiome and Genomics (ACCME) prospective cohort study in central Nigeria. A total of 220 eligible women undergoing cervical cancer screening were enrolled. Baseline measurements were obtained prior to the intervention. The standardized educational intervention, delivered by trained research staff, included brochures, leaflets, an instructional video, verbal instructions, and hands-on familiarization with the Evalyn Results: Most participants were married (63.2%), belonged to the middle socioeconomic group (69.5%), had prior knowledge of cervical cancer (61.8%), and had never undergone screening (89.5%). At baseline, 91.8% were willing to self-sample. The intervention significantly improved mean attitude scores from 42.6 (SD 8.3) to 50.8 (SD 9.8) (p<0.001). Among women unwilling to self-sample, 50.0% (9/18) were in the lower SES group compared with 12.9% (26/202) among willing participants (p<0.001). In exploratory analyses, younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00), cervical cancer knowledge (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00-1.99), middle SES (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.07-12.66), and pre-intervention attitude (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.99) were associated with willingness. Conclusions: A structured educational intervention significantly improved attitudes toward HPV self-sampling. Baseline willingness was high, and exploratory analysis indicate that younger age, better knowledge, and middle SES are associated with willingness. These findings support context-specific educational strategies to optimize HPV self-sampling uptake in Nigeria and similar low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.