ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Adjusting Training Task Difficulty to Enhance Skill Transfer in Venipuncture: Evidence from Video Analysis.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We examine the impact of modifying the difficulty level of venipuncture at different training stages on the enhancement of skill transfer. Methods: Medical students were recruited and assigned into either a control or an experimental group, both underwent 4 days of training. The control group practices venipuncture tasks under quiet and consistent environment. The experimental group were given pressures by the standardized patients or exposure to noise environment in the late training stages. The performance was videotaped. All trainees were assessed one day (Test 1) and one week (Test 2) post-training for skill transfer. Results: At Test 1, the experimental group showed significantly shorter puncture time (P = 0.042) and a near-significant trend for skin disinfection time (P = 0.055), while total task time did not differ significantly. At Test 2, the experimental group demonstrated significantly shorter total task time (P = 0.039), skin disinfection time (P = 0.023), puncture time (P = 0.035), and tourniquet banding time (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in overall performance scores, but doctor‑patient communications showed significant differences between groups at Test 1 (P = 0.000) and within‑group changes in the control group (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Evidence from video analysis suggests that adjusting the difficulty of training can enhance the skill transfer in the venipuncture task, primarily by improving procedural efficiency, which inspires us to explore more effective way to improve the training outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.