SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Global prevalence and risk factors of bovine tuberculosis in cattle: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Global Prevalence of Tuberculosis Infection in Buffaloes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global prevalence of bTB, identify key risk factors, and evaluate diagnostic approaches to support evidence-based control strategies within a One Health framework. Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted across eight electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, CAB Abstracts, SpringerLink, and AJOL) for studies published between 1990 and October 2025. A total of 7,775 records were identified, of which 98 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis. Results: The pooled global prevalence of bTB was estimated at 3.98% (95% CI, 3.94-4.03) and an overall herd's estimate was 18.48% (95% CI, 17.47-19.49). Meta-analysis revealed a significantly lower odds of infection at the animal level compared to herd level (OR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.15-0.37; Conclusion: Bovine tuberculosis remains a persistent and unevenly distributed zoonotic disease, with a disproportionate burden in Africa and Asia. The higher detection at herd level, significant influence of age and breed, and variability in diagnostic methods underscore the need for harmonized surveillance systems, improved diagnostic standardization, and targeted control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.