Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100182›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

The Utility of Computed Tomography Angiography and Color Doppler Ultrasound in Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Vanesa Lovětínská, Andrej Sukop, Matěj Patzelt, Jozef Kučerák, Michal Kamenisty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vanesa LovětínskáFrom the Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andrej SukopFrom the Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Matěj PatzeltFrom the Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, 3rd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jozef KučerákInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal KamenistyJnJ, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lower limb reconstruction remains a significant challenge, often requiring free flap transfers. However, the goal is not only flap survival and limb salvage but ultimately restoration of independent ambulation. Therefore, this study aimed to identify risk factors associated with adverse functional outcomes in lower extremity reconstruction despite initial microsurgical success. Methods: A retrospective review of all free flaps performed for lower extremity reconstructions in our unit between 2006 and 2022 was undertaken. Apart from demographic details, data collection focused on long-term results regarding weight bearing, ambulatory status, and secondary amputation and overall function using the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS). Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for adverse functional outcomes. Results: A total of 466 consecutive patients undergoing 516 free flap procedures were included. The mean follow-up was 46 months. In most cases, preoperative ambulatory status was restored postoperatively, resulting in 86.4% achieving unassisted ambulation (12.9% assisted, 0.5% wheelchair). Evaluation of 251 LEFS scores (average follow-up 7.8 y) showed a mean value of 55.4 points. Overall, 3.77% of patients underwent secondary amputation. The most significant risk factors associated with secondary amputation were flap failure and postoperative infections, whereas lower LEFS scores significantly correlated with secondary amputation and obesity. Conclusions: Lower extremity reconstruction remains a challenging endeavor for reconstructive surgeons, where flap survival should not be regarded as the endpoint. Functional restoration and independent ambulation should constitute the main goals, and patient-specific factors should be considered in an individualized approach.

Identifiers

PMID42100182
PMCPMC13148747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.