Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100126›Full record

ArticlePopulation research and policy review2023

Child Allowances and Work-Family Reconciliation Policies: What Best Reduces Child Poverty and Gender Inequality While Enabling Desired Fertility?

Jennifer Glass, Carolyn E Waldrep

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population research and policy review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer GlassDepartment of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78723, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6774-7964
Carolyn E WaldrepDepartment of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78723, USA.

Funding

Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent legislative proposals in the United States to either institute a child allowance for all families or continue a temporary Covid-related child tax credit similar to an allowance have reignited a debate about family allowances, and whether direct monetary subsidies to families with minor children have unintended consequences for gender inequality and mothers' labor market success. Advocates for work-family reconciliation policies argue that policies providing paid time off and flexibility in work hours and schedule should enable women to assume financial responsibility for their children and, thus, increase intended fertility without diminishing the quality of care provided to children, while encouraging men to participate more in the domestic sphere. We summarize the limited but growing evidentiary basis for both policy viewpoints, reviewing hundreds of studies on policy implementation and outcomes across rich industrialized countries, comparing the results in terms of their effects on child poverty, gender inequality, and intended fertility.

Indexed as

Child allowancesChild povertyFamily policyFertilityWomen’s labor force participation

Identifiers

PMID42100126
PMCPMC13148368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.