Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100124›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2026

Factors associated with responses to hearing screening questions among older adults.

Lauren K Dillard, Judy R Dubno, Meagan Perro, Allyson V Drawdy, Sarah Tucker Marrison, Theodore R McRackan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren K DillardDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Meagan PerroDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Allyson V DrawdyCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Sarah Tucker MarrisonDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Theodore R McRackanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Early intervention as a determinant of hearing aid benefit for age-related hearing loss: Results from longitudinal cohort studiesF32DC021078 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DILLARD, LAUREN KAY · 2023 to 2024
$148k
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC021078NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Systematic screening could promote earlier detection and management of age-related hearing loss (ARHL), but there is limited research to support its implementation. This study describes findings from an ARHL screening program, including responses to screening questions and factors associated with responses. Methods: A pilot ARHL screening program was launched at 2 Family Medicine and 3 Otolaryngology (ENT) clinics at the Medical University of South Carolina between July 2017 and December 2020. All screening processes, including automatic referrals to audiology clinics, were integrated into the Epic electronic health record. Patients were asked a series of simple screening questions related to perceived hearing loss, current treatment, and desire for a referral to audiology. We report demographic and clinic-level factors associated with responses to each hearing screening question. Results: A total of 5360 patients were asked hearing screening questions (65.6% in ENT clinics). Patients' mean age was 73.0 (SD: 6.7) years, 58.3% were female and 29.0% Black/African American race. Forty-three percent of patients reported hearing loss. Among those, 38% reported not being treated, and among those with reported hearing loss and no treatment, 51% requested a referral to audiology. Demographic and clinic-level factors, including the date and clinic location of screening, were associated with responses to each screening question. Conclusions: Simple screening questions asked in outpatient clinical settings can identify patients with perceived hearing loss and who are interested in receiving hearing health care. Demographic and clinic-level factors should be accounted for in research related to the effectiveness of ARHL screening.

Indexed as

AudiologyHearing lossMass screeningOtolaryngologyPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID42100124
PMCPMC13147388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.