ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2026
Factors associated with responses to hearing screening questions among older adults.
Article in American journal of medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of a Large-Scale Pilot Hearing Screening Program at an Academic Medical Center.American journal of medicine open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Systematic screening could promote earlier detection and management of age-related hearing loss (ARHL), but there is limited research to support its implementation. This study describes findings from an ARHL screening program, including responses to screening questions and factors associated with responses. Methods: A pilot ARHL screening program was launched at 2 Family Medicine and 3 Otolaryngology (ENT) clinics at the Medical University of South Carolina between July 2017 and December 2020. All screening processes, including automatic referrals to audiology clinics, were integrated into the Epic electronic health record. Patients were asked a series of simple screening questions related to perceived hearing loss, current treatment, and desire for a referral to audiology. We report demographic and clinic-level factors associated with responses to each hearing screening question. Results: A total of 5360 patients were asked hearing screening questions (65.6% in ENT clinics). Patients' mean age was 73.0 (SD: 6.7) years, 58.3% were female and 29.0% Black/African American race. Forty-three percent of patients reported hearing loss. Among those, 38% reported not being treated, and among those with reported hearing loss and no treatment, 51% requested a referral to audiology. Demographic and clinic-level factors, including the date and clinic location of screening, were associated with responses to each screening question. Conclusions: Simple screening questions asked in outpatient clinical settings can identify patients with perceived hearing loss and who are interested in receiving hearing health care. Demographic and clinic-level factors should be accounted for in research related to the effectiveness of ARHL screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.