ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Motivated by mortality:
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Tale of Two Cohorts: Comparing HPV Vaccination Barriers and Facilitators Among HIV-Negative and HIV-Positive Women in Tennessee.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a significant public health issue in the United States. Among women living with HIV (WLHIV), one of the most serious health risks is co-infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). WLHIV are more likely to acquire and retain high-risk HPV strains, which increases their risk of developing cervical cancer. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the attitudes, beliefs, and vaccination status of WLHIV residing in Tennessee regarding the HPV vaccine series, as well as the impact of their HIV status and antiretroviral treatment on these factors. Methods: A qualitative approach using narrative interviews was utilized to encourage fluid and flexible storytelling from WLHIV. Eligibility criteria included WLHIV aged 18 to 45, of various ethnicities, residing in Tennessee, English-speaking, and willing to share their experiences related to HIV and HPV. The narrative interviews were conducted over the phone in 2024 and audio recorded. The recordings were then transcribed by a third-party, and the data were analyzed using narrative analysis in Dedoose®, a qualitative software. Results: A total of 19 WLHIV were interviewed over a six-month period, and all participants identified as Black, with a mean age of 39 years. Three themes were identified and illustrate the experiences of the participants Conclusion: The data highlighted that some participants had limited awareness of HPV, despite it being the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. Detailed evidence of the intrinsic motivators that contribute to adherence to antiretroviral treatment were provided. Additionally, various factors affecting both treatment adherence and the uptake of the HPV vaccine were emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.