ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Implementation of pharmacists' services into the care trajectory of older adults with neurocognitive disorder in multidisciplinary primary care clinics: A mixed-methods study.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Quebec, Canada, the "Alzheimer plan" encourages pharmacist participation in the care of older adults with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) within multidisciplinary primary care clinics, known as Family Medicine Groups (FMGs). This study examined how these services were implemented from the perspective of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study combining cross-sectional questionnaires with semi-structured interviews across eight FMGs participating in a quasi-experimental project about the impact of pharmacists' activities on older adults' medication and well-being. Data collection and analysis were guided by the Normalization Process Theory and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A deductive thematic content analysis was carried out, using the five CFIR constructs as themes. Data from questionnaires were analyzed alongside interview data to gain a broader perspective on the implementation process. Results: Eighteen professionals (nine pharmacists, four physicians, five nurses) participated. From a quantitative perspective, pharmacists' integration was perceived positively: high agreement was reported regarding the intervention's potential value (90% pharmacists, 100% other professionals) and its adaptability (100% pharmacists, 80% other professionals). Also, 100% of physicians and nurses intended to continue to use pharmacists' services in the future. Qualitatively, facilitators included an easy-to-implement innovation (innovation characteristics), legislative changes (outer setting), the pharmacist's physical presence, strong interprofessional trust (inner setting), and proactive pharmacists' leadership (individuals) with regular team reminders (implementation process). Conversely, insufficient government funding (outer setting) and workload pressures were identified as primary barriers. Conclusions: Implementing pharmacist services for older adults with NCDs in FMGs is feasible and beneficial, improving workflow and team efficiency beyond NCD care. Strong interprofessional collaboration, effective communication, and clear role definition were key facilitators, while insufficient funding and workload pressures remain major challenges to implementation. Co-construction between primary care teams and decision-makers is essential to achieve successful scale-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.