Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100075›Full record

ReviewMediterranean journal of rheumatology2026

Optimising Conventional Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Alexandros A Drosos, Paraskevi V Voulgari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandros A DrososDepartment of Rheumatology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Paraskevi V VoulgariDepartment of Rheumatology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the decades of the 1980s and 1990s, before the onset of biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management, there was a significant number of patients who did not achieve remission or low disease activity (LDA), due to limited therapeutic choices. At that time, only some conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), along with steroids, were used. Nowadays, despite the progress of RA management with the introduction of biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, which showed significant clinical improvement and retardation of radiological damage, unmet needs of RA treatment still exist. On the other hand, the concept of treat-to-target (T2T) approach and tight control monitoring of disease activity, are considered now the cornerstone for achieving remission or LDA in RA patients. Several clinical trials confirmed the efficacy and safety of csDMARDs using the tight control and T2T strategies. Methotrexate is the fundamental drug for RA management and in combination with other csDMARDs, with or without steroids, it has proven to be efficacious and safe and less expensive in comparison to newer biologic therapies. Furthermore, MTX demonstrated cardioprotective effects and reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in RA patients Therefore, there is a potential for improving treatment strategies with conventional therapies in the management of early RA. Optimal and early use of csDMARDs controls disease activity similarly to biologic therapies and is less expensive.

Indexed as

antirheumatic agentsbiologic therapiesmethotrexaterheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID42100075
PMCPMC13145289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.