ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Microscopic attributes of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The olive tree ( Methods: In the present study, microscopic differences were comparatively analyzed in fully expanded leaves of five olive varieties sampled in Galicia (Brétema, Carapucho, Cobrancosa, Hedreira, and Mansa Gallega) and cultivated under controlled greenhouse conditions. Using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, we quantified adaxial cuticle thickness, palisade chlorophyll parenchyma thickness, leaf blade thickness, stomatal density, trichome density, and trichome morphometric traits. Additional qualitative traits were also assessed, including the presence of raphides and trichosclereids, the size of intercellular spaces in the aerenchymatous parenchyma, starch occurrence, the degree of curvature of the distal leaf portion, and the thickness of the vascular bundle sheath in the midrib. Results: Significant intervarietal differences were detected, allowing the identification of two distinct clusters. Group I (Brétema and Carapucho) was characterized by greater cuticle and leaf blade thickness, higher trichome density, a thinner vascular bundle sheath, and smaller intercellular spaces. Group II (Cobrancosa, Hedreira, and Mansa Gallega) showed lower cuticle and leaf blade thickness, lower trichome density, a thicker vascular bundle sheath, and larger intercellular spaces. Discussion: These results indicate contrasting histological configurations that may reflect different patterns of environmental adjustment among varieties. The observed traits suggest that Group I displays a more xeromorphic anatomical organization, whereas Group II shows features consistent with comparatively less structurally buffered leaf environments. Conclusions: Based on these findings and following the global bioclimatic classification system of Rivas-Martínez, the most suitable bioclimatic areas in northwestern Iberia for cultivation of the studied olive varieties are proposed. This study highlights the histological variability of olive leaves and provides useful information for varietal selection in relation to different bioclimatic contexts, including future climate change scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.