ArticleOncology letters2026
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in conformal and image-guided external-beam radiotherapy have expanded its application in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before resection for HCC with vascular invasion remains uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus hepatectomy vs. hepatectomy alone in resectable HCC with vascular invasion. Databases were searched through August 1, 2024. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A total of four studies (n=362) were included. In the overall pooled analysis, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in 1-year OS [risk ratio (RR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-3.69] or 2-year OS (RR 2.64; 95% CI 0.57-12.27), with considerable heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.