Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100020›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2026

Identification of Key Determinants for Perceived Sweetness and Sourness in Fresh Grapes.

Yingjian Cai, Lingling Hu, Liufei Huang, Qianqian Zheng, Yi Qin, Yueyan Wu, Zhongyi Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingjian CaiCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5137-9056
Lingling HuCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.
Liufei HuangCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.
Qianqian ZhengCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.
Yi QinCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.
Yueyan WuCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.
Zhongyi YangCollege of Biology and Environment Zhejiang Wanli University Ningbo China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of sweetness and sourness is a critical sensory indicator of the sensory quality of table grapes. This study comprehensively analyzed the relationships between traditional physicochemical evaluation metrics (soluble solids content, SSC; titratable acidity, TAC; and their ratio, RTT) and the perceived sweetness and perceived sourness assessed by a trained sensory panel across 42 grape varieties. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between these traditional metrics and the perceived sweetness and sourness, indicating limitations in their accuracy for precisely characterizing the sensory experience. To achieve a more accurate description of grape perceived sweetness and sourness, we employed high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to quantify the individual sugar and acid components within the grape juice from these 42 cultivars. Subsequently, we integrated correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the sensory attributes. Ultimately, we identified tartaric acid and fructose contents as reliable key indicators for representing perceived sweetness and sourness, and the overall sensory quality of table grapes.

Indexed as

fructosegrapeperceived sournessperceived sweetnesssensory qualitytartaric acid

Identifiers

PMID42100020
PMCPMC13144547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.