ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Optimal timing of endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a real world single center study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the optimal timing of endovascular treatment for acute cerebral infarction with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) in real world practice. Methods: This retrospective single center study enrolled consecutive sICAS patients undergoing intervention. According to the interval from symptom onset to intervention, patients were divided into early (≤14 days) and delayed (>14 days) intervention groups. Primary outcomes were any stroke or death within 30 days and the 90-day mRS score. Secondary analyses explored factors influencing surgical timing. Results: Among 211 eligible patients, 174 were analyzed, including 53 patients in the early intervention group and 121 patients in the delayed intervention group. The 30-day stroke or death rates were 11.3 and 8.3%, and unfavorable 90-day outcomes were 18.9 and 10.7% in the early and delayed groups ( Conclusion: In anterior circulation sICAS with minor stroke (NIHSS ≤ 3), high Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS)/posterior circulation ASPECTS (pcASPECTS) (8-9), and well-controlled LDL, intervention timing may not be restricted, whereas Basilar artery (BA) lesions appear better suited for delayed intervention. Multiple parallel severe stenoses, severe pre-existing global brain injury, and plaque high-signal intensity did not influence on the surgical timing. The conclusions of this study should be validated in future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.