Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Transcendental model selection: a computational account of symbolic cognition and general intelligence through morality and culture.

Shagor Rahman, Andrew Pashea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shagor RahmanActive Inference Institute, Westfield, NJ, United States.
Andrew PasheaActive Inference Institute, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General intelligence enables flexible problem solving across diverse contexts by minimizing uncertainty. Symbolic systems such as language extend this capacity, allowing humans to build social groups and construct world models beyond typical biological constraints. Previous research on linguistic communication within active inference has emphasized deep hierarchical models that ensure shared semantics between communicators. We argue that these models, while powerful, require extension to account for symbolic genesis, specifically using morality not only as uncertainty minimization across cultural niches, but also as the mechanism that created the virtual space enabling symbolic cognition. Our ancestors transcended dyadic modeling by implementing cultural layers through novel model selection, enabling in-group signaling and hierarchical social organization through psychological typing. This rendered the generative process endogenous (self-referential). Our emotional and impulsive tendency toward morality, we argue, enabled the deeper level of abstraction and the stable third-party triangulated perspective necessary for symbolic thought. This framework can be evaluated through simulations similar to recent active inference literature and provides a foundation for building generally intelligent systems aligned with human cultural values.

Indexed as

active inferenceagent-based modelingartificial intelligencecultural evolutionmoral psychologysocial cognitionstructure learningsymbolic communication

Identifiers

PMID42099963
PMCPMC13143734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.