ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Transcendental model selection: a computational account of symbolic cognition and general intelligence through morality and culture.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
General intelligence enables flexible problem solving across diverse contexts by minimizing uncertainty. Symbolic systems such as language extend this capacity, allowing humans to build social groups and construct world models beyond typical biological constraints. Previous research on linguistic communication within active inference has emphasized deep hierarchical models that ensure shared semantics between communicators. We argue that these models, while powerful, require extension to account for symbolic genesis, specifically using morality not only as uncertainty minimization across cultural niches, but also as the mechanism that created the virtual space enabling symbolic cognition. Our ancestors transcended dyadic modeling by implementing cultural layers through novel model selection, enabling in-group signaling and hierarchical social organization through psychological typing. This rendered the generative process endogenous (self-referential). Our emotional and impulsive tendency toward morality, we argue, enabled the deeper level of abstraction and the stable third-party triangulated perspective necessary for symbolic thought. This framework can be evaluated through simulations similar to recent active inference literature and provides a foundation for building generally intelligent systems aligned with human cultural values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.