ReviewFrontiers in microbiomes2026
Understanding the human gut microbiome: from composition to disease association.
Review in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ecological Engineering of the Human Gut Microbiome: A Narrative Review and Framework for Next-Generation Therapeutics.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Review
- Gut microbiota-targeted bioactive peptides as emerging axis in nutritional therapeutics: trends, challenges, and prospects.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human gut microbiota is critical for regulating host metabolism, immune responses, epithelial integrity, and systemic homeostasis, and disturbance has been linked to metabolic, inflammatory, and immune-mediated illnesses. Despite significant advances in microbiome research, the interpretation of gut microbiota-disease relationships is still limited by an overreliance on taxonomic profiling and observational study designs, which frequently overlook functional, strain-level, and mechanistic aspects of host-microbiota interactions. Growing research suggests that microbial functional capacity, metabolic activity, and ecological features such as resilience and functional redundancy are better markers of gut health than compositional measurements alone. Nonetheless, significant inter-individual variability, methodological heterogeneity, and dependence on fecal-based analysis continue to limit reproducibility and causal inference across studies. This review integrates current evidence on gut microbiota composition, functional features, and important influencing variables, while emphasizing mechanistic linkages between microbial dysbiosis and major human illnesses, filling significant conceptual gaps in modern microbiome research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.