ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022
AcT Trial: Protocol for a Pragmatic Registry-Linked Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors and Consequences of Serious Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Thrombolysis: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the AcT Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Association of 24-Hour Computed Tomography Infarct Density on Functional Outcomes in Stroke: Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Brain Atrophy and White Matter Changes Grading Agreement on NCCT and MRI in Ischemic Stroke.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Trial
- Association Between Ipsilateral Stroke and Nonstenotic (<50%) Carotid Disease: Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Association of Minimal Clinically Important Difference With Infarct Volume in Clinical Poststroke Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Brain Frailty and Functional Outcomes After Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Tenecteplase versus Alteplase and First-Pass Reperfusion in Endovascular Thrombectomy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Thrombolysis by Infarct Type in Patients with No Visible Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of the AcT Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- The treatment effect across ASPECTS in acute ischemic stroke: Analysis from the AcT trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Trial
- Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in stroke patients with carotid tandem lesions: Results from the AcT trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase Compared With Alteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the ACT Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2023Trial
- Comparing Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Young Adult Patients With Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the AcT Trial.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Influence of geography, stroke timing, and weather conditions on transport and workflow times: Results from a longitudinal 5-year Canadian provincial registry.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Feasibility of telephone and computerized cognitive testing as a secondary outcome in an acute stroke clinical trial: A mixed methods sub-study of the AcT Trial.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Intravenous Tenecteplase Compared With Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Canada (AcT): Bridging the Gap From Academia to Regulatory Approval.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Thrombolysis in Patients With Versus Without Visible Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial.Journal of stroke · 2025Article
- Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Patients: Protocol for the ORIGINAL Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial.Journal of stroke · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is widely used in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting early after symptom onset. Recent phase II trials have suggested that intravenous tenecteplase may be safer and associated with higher early reperfusion rates as compared with alteplase. This study investigates whether intravenous tenecteplase is noninferior to intravenous alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This is a pragmatic, registry-linked, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled, open-label parallel group clinical trial (AcT [Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke]) with blinded end point assessment of 1600 patients to test if intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight, maximum dose 25 mg) is noninferior to intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg body weight; maximum dose, 90 mg) in patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for intravenous thrombolysis in clinical routine. Patients are recruited from comprehensive and primary stroke centers and enrolled using deferral of consent. The proposed sample has at least 90% power with a noninferiority margin of 5%, assuming incidence of the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 is 38% in the tenecteplase and 35% in the alteplase groups, and a loss to follow-up rate <5%. Results: The blinded primary end point is the proportion of subjects achieving a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1. Key safety outcomes include 24-hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 90-day all-cause mortality. All serious adverse events within a 24-hour period will be reported and coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Outcomes are collected either centrally (primary, key secondary, and safety end points) or through ongoing Canadian stroke registries. The primary analysis is a simple unadjusted comparison of proportions. Conclusions: Results from the trial will provide real-world evidence of the effectiveness of intravenous tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting early after stroke onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.