ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2026
The Changes Over 15 Years Within a Pediatric Chronic Pain Service.
Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Changes Over 15 Years Within a Pediatric Chronic Pain Service.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do we know if a service is working? How has the presentation and management of children with chronic pain changed over the last fifteen years and what demonstrates adherence to changing guidelines? This audit of a large tertiary pediatric chronic pain service assessed relevant multivariate data gathered over the last 15 years to try to give an insight and answer these questions. All patients with electronic patient records (EPR) referred to the chronic pain service in the West of Scotland from 2010 to 2025 were audited. Any patients not seen in clinic at least once were excluded. Patients were grouped into epochs based on their most recent or last pain clinic appointment. 728 patients were included. The audit found that the service is seeing a greater proportion of patients with primary chronic pain diagnoses, accounting for over 40% of patients in the last epoch (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.