Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099896›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Structure visibility and online adaptation suitability of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in thoracic radiotherapy.

Agustinus J A J van de Schoot, Joan J Penninkhof, Britt Kunnen, Kimm P Fremeijer, Elise M Nicolai-Koornneef, Kirsten Offereins-van Harten, Judith H Sluijter, Nienke D Sijtsema, Marjan van de Pol, Raymond de Boer and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Agustinus J A J van de SchootDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Joan J PenninkhofDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Britt KunnenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Kimm P FremeijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Elise M Nicolai-KoornneefDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Kirsten Offereins-van HartenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Judith H SluijterDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Nienke D SijtsemaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marjan van de PolDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Raymond de BoerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maarten L P DirkxDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Steven F PetitDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: A recently introduced high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT Materials and methods: Twenty lung cancer patients treated in free-breathing and twenty left-sided breast cancer patients treated in deep-inspiration breath-hold were included in this prospective clinical study. Three CBCT imaging pairs per patient, consisting of CBCT Results: In total, 4440 structure visibility and 960 oART suitability scores were collected. Patient-averaged scores favored CBCT Conclusion: In thoracic radiotherapy, CBCT

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyBreast cancerCone-beam computed tomographyHyperSight CBCTImage-guided radiotherapyLung cancerThoracic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42099896
PMCPMC13147364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.