Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099890›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Get a Grip: How Hand Anthropometrics, Grip Strength, and Sex Influence Power Tool Use in Orthopaedics.

Catrin Morgan, Olivia O'Malley, Esma Lüleci, Chahak Saraogi, Peter Reilly, Angela E Kedgley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catrin MorganDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1273-8312
Olivia O'MalleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9674-1553
Esma LüleciDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7837-3405
Chahak SaraogiSchool of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8602-8007
Peter ReillyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-910X
Angela E KedgleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7282-6651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Female surgeons typically have smaller hands, report negative perceptions, and experience pain and discomfort related to instrument design. The aims of this study were to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons receive teaching on power-tool handling, identify power-tool grips used, evaluate whether grip strength and hand anthropometrics influence grip choice, and examine the impact of sex on power tool perceptions. Methods: Orthopaedic surgeons (residents and attendings) were surveyed on their power tool perceptions and teaching methods. An objective assessment was carried out which included the categorization of power tool grips, measurement of grip strength, and anthropometric measurements of the hand. Results: Forty-six orthopaedic surgeons (12 female, 34 male) were recruited with a response rate of 96%. No orthopaedic surgeon reported formal teaching on power tool handling. Female surgeons reported more negative experiences using the wire driver and drill. Participants demonstrated 2 variations in power tool posture, with an equal split, determined by the index finger position on either the top or bottom trigger. The index finger bottom position was associated with reduced grip strength, female sex, and smaller hand and palm length compared with the index finger top position. Conclusion: Surgeons with smaller hands or lower grip strength, particularly females, were more likely to use an index finger supported grip, likely as a compensatory strategy. There is the need for early training in power-tool ergonomics and grip techniques, as well as grip strengthening initiatives. The current one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate; manufacturers should ensure designs accommodate a wide range of hand sizes, accounting for palm length and overall hand length, to accommodate all users.

Identifiers

PMID42099890
PMCPMC13148738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.