ArticleJB & JS open access
Biomechanical and Computational Modeling of Metastatic Acetabular Defects: Influence of Tumor Location on the Risk of Fracture.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic bone disease can lead to pathologic fracture of the pelvis which affects quality of life. There are limited validated approaches for biomechanical modeling, classification, or surgical treatment of metastatic acetabular defects. Methods: An artificial hemipelvis bone was used to calibrate a computed tomography-based computational model of the pelvis with varying locations and sizes of acetabular defects. Metastatic defects affecting the anterior and posterior column, medial wall, and their combinations were created. Mechanical testing was performed on each defect, and images of the lateral surface of the acetabulum were analyzed by digital image correlation to measure peak surface strains. Finite element models were calibrated to match the measured peak surface strains. Pelvic stress during acetabular loading was predicted at the (1) medial wall, (2) superior acetabular region, (3) anterior, and (4) posterior columns. Acetabular regions with the highest risk for fracture based on margin of safety were identified by the defect type. Results: The predicted surface strains were strongly correlated ( Conclusions: Pelvic fragility resulting from metastatic lesions was sensitive to the periacetabular defect location. Combined posterior column and medial wall defects caused the greatest compromise to pelvic structural integrity, with the superior acetabular region and medial wall identified as the most critical locations for pelvic fracture. These findings influence surgical decision-making by identifying posterior column and medial wall lesions as high-risk patterns that may require earlier prophylactic stabilization. Level of Evidence: Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.