ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Evolution of bispecific and multispecific antibodies in cancer therapy.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated molecular and immune profiling identifies FOXA1 as a complementary co-target to MUC1 for bispecific immunotherapy in breast cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Advancing oncology innovation under persistent constraints.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-based cancer therapy has rapidly evolved from monoclonal antibodies to bispecific and multispecific constructs that combine distinct binding specificities and mechanisms. These agents are seeing increasing clinical adoption, with European Medicines Agency approvals in haematological malignancies and selected solid tumours such as uveal melanoma and EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. However, they are often still discussed as a single drug class, which does not capture the complexity of current formats and mechanisms, ranging from IgG-like to fragment-based architectures and from immune-cell redirection to dual immune modulation or oncogenic pathway blockade. This Series paper provides an integrated classification framework based on mechanism and format, relating key design features to pharmacology, efficacy, and safety. It synthesizes clinical evidence and ongoing development, discusses practical strategies to mitigate hallmark toxicities, and reviews emerging resistance mechanisms and rational combination approaches. It also outlines next generation directions, including higher order multispecific constructs, conditionally active antibodies, and payload conjugated multispecific formats. To consolidate these agents as an established therapeutic modality in oncology, priority should be given to rigorous understanding of mechanisms of action and toxicity, alongside rational optimisation of construct design and dosing, supported by robust prospective translational programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.