ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
The light at the other end of the tunnel: heeding two decades of regeneration research to reclaim natural tooth preservation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advancements in biomimetic and regenerative dentistry, contemporary prosthetic restorations, though clinically successful, remain fundamentally imperfect replications of the natural tooth's inherent biological perfection. Crucially, while these advancements remain vital, the dental discipline has increasingly shifted from preventive focus to a reparative focus. Given that dental decay-the primary concern in a dental practice-is a highly predictable and preventable condition and that tooth loss is a largely avoidable outcome, we propose that the future of the discipline lies in transitioning focus from substitution of lost or damaged tooth parts to the preservation of what is hitherto biologically irreplaceable. Reviewing current dental practice and research, this perspective article challenges the dental community to maximize tooth longevity by acknowledging that in dentistry-more than any other medical discipline-prevention remains the cure. Our challenge invokes the 'paradox of knowledge'-where expanded understanding unveils deeper unknown-to bring to the fore that the more we uncover the intricacies of the dental bioarchitecture, the clearer it becomes that preservation of the invaluable and irreproducible natural tooth structure, rather than its repair, is the achievable path forward. This realization warrants a paradigm "U-turn" towards the light at the starting end of the reparative tunnel. We contend that a successful shift from tooth replacement or regeneration to tooth preservation is twofold: it requires a mindful appraisal of contemporary scientific knowledge concerning the tooth mechano-biology as an unparalleled organ in the body, as well as a fundamental reexamination of the values of a profession existing to alleviate people's suffering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.