Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099849›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Comparative evaluation of erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Tanvi Bhargava, Divya Srivastava, Tapas Kumar Singh, Abhishek Kumar, Himanshu Vats, Sandeep Sahu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tanvi BhargavaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Divya SrivastavaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tapas Kumar SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abhishek KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Himanshu VatsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sandeep SahuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This randomized parallel group trial was conducted to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of erector spinae (ES) plane block and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) plane block in laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. Methods: Sixty voluntary kidney donors received either TAP block (TAP group) or ES plane block (ES group) with 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine at the end of surgery before tracheal extubation. Postoperatively, all patients received patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous fentanyl. Tramadol 100 mg was administered intravenously as a rescue analgesic. The primary outcome was 24 and 48 h of fentanyl consumption. Static and dynamic pain scores at 30 min, 2 Results: There was a significant reduction in fentanyl consumption in the ES group compared to the TAP group at 24 h (429.00 ± 103.06 μg vs. 537.33 ± 187.97 μg) ( Conclusion: ES plane block results in lower postoperative fentanyl consumption compared to TAP block in living donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Identifiers

PMID42099849
PMCPMC13148848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.