Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099845›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Comparison between spectra modes of STORZ professional image enhancement system™ and white light cystoscopy in diagnosis of bladder lesions.

Kunal Vinayak, Subhash V Kotwal, Vikram B Kaushik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kunal VinayakDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Artemis Health Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Subhash V KotwalDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Artemis Health Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Vikram B KaushikDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Artemis Health Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: White light cystoscopy (WLC) often fails to detect flat or subtle bladder lesions. Enhanced imaging techniques offer improved detection. The Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (SPIES™) overcomes these limitations and enables concurrent display of WLC and enhanced images, potentially improving tumor detection. In this study, the SPIES™ system was integrated into the diagnostic cystoscopy protocol to compare Spectra™ modes with conventional WLC in the diagnosis of bladder lesions. Methods: This 1-year prospective observational pilot study included 150 patients with suspected or known bladder tumors. Each patient initially underwent WLC, followed by Spectra B™ and Spectra A™ modes. Lesions were mapped according to EAU guidelines; suspicious areas were biopsied or resected for histopathological analysis. Results: WLC showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 45%, with a false positive rate (FPR) of 54.5%. After WLC, Spectra B did not detect any additional lesions, whereas Spectra A identified three additional lesions, including a T2 recurrence. Spectra A™ had 100% sensitivity, but lower specificity (35%) and higher FPR (65%). Spectra A™ detected more lesions than WLC, although the difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: Spectra A™ showed higher sensitivity and identified additional cancerous lesions, including one muscle-invasive tumor missed by WLC. However, it also had a significantly higher FPR. While promising, it has its limitations. Spectra A™ shows potential and warrants further research in larger, multicenter trials.

Identifiers

PMID42099845
PMCPMC13148838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.