ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
Surgery in stage IIA/IIB seminoma: A "Living systematic review" and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Concerns about the long-term toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in stage II seminoma have renewed the interest in the surgical management. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has emerged as a potential treatment alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) evaluates the oncological, functional, and peri-operative outcomes of RPLND in stage II seminoma. Methods: A SRMA (systematic review and meta-analysis) of prospective studies was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies included prospective trials assessing RPLND in stage II seminoma. Outcomes analyzed were relapse-free survival (RFS), recurrence patterns, functional outcomes, and peri-operative complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle--Ottawa Scale. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250559629). Results: Four prospective phase II studies with 216 patients were included. The pooled 2-year RFS was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.8%--92.2%). In-field recurrence occurred in 5.5%, while the rate of out-of-field recurrence was 10.1%. Preservation of antegrade ejaculation was achieved in 92.8% (95% CI: 87.4%--98.1%). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA) were reported in 9.6% of the patients. Risk of bias was low to moderate across the studies. Conclusions: Primary RPLND is a feasible and safe treatment for carefully selected patients with stage II seminoma, providing favorable oncological control, high rates of functional preservation, and acceptable morbidity. While short-term outcomes are encouraging, long-term follow-up and randomized comparisons with conventional therapy are required to establish its definitive role.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.