ArticleClinical hematology international2026
Guidelines and consensus for minimal residual disease-adapted therapy in multiple myeloma from the Pan-Pacific multiple myeloma working group.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kidney transplantation in multiple myeloma: patient selection, timing, and post-transplant challenges in the modern therapeutic era.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has entered the era of deep remission-oriented therapy, where minimal residual disease (MRD) has become a key indicator for treatment response and long-term prognosis, surpassing conventional complete remission criteria. However, the optimal integration of MRD into clinical decision-making remains to be established. This expert consensus offers evidence-based guidance on redefining treatment goals in the era of CD38-based therapy, incorporating MRD status into therapeutic decisions, standardizing MRD detection, and integrating new technologies to address current challenges. The consensus supports including MRD assessment in treatment evaluation for almost all MM patients and recommends a comprehensive approach that combines bone marrow, imaging, and peripheral blood-based assessments. For patients receiving CD38-based therapy, achieving and sustaining MRD negativity is strongly linked to improved outcomes. The timing and frequency of MRD testing should be adapted to treatment phases, and CD38-based therapy may be used as part of active maintenance strategies, especially in high-risk populations. Dynamic MRD monitoring is emphasized as a critical part of disease management. Both next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing are considered interchangeable for prognostic assessment, while peripheral residual disease detection is a promising direction for future disease surveillance. This consensus provides a practical framework for integrating MRD assessment into MM clinical management. Dynamic, MRD-guided treatment strategies may enable more precise risk stratification and personalized therapy, ultimately improving long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.